California’s nutritional standards in a high school setting
Posted September 5th, 2008. Categorized under California. 8 Comments
In 2005, the California state legislature passed a bill for stricter nutritional guidelines on foods that could be sold at public schools. The new policy took effect during my sophomore year in high school, and I noticed an immediate difference in students reactions around my school.
Before the policy went into effect, a major income source for our student government was from the student store. There we could buy sodas, chips, crackers, and other snacks for rather cheap prices. Vending machines around campus were always properly stocked.
However when the new standards kicked in, snack bar sales plummeted. My old high school has an open campus lunch, and often vendors will come right up to the school boundaries to sell food to students during lunch time. Immediately, these vendors started selling all of the foods that the school no longer could. Students that couldn’t drive flocked to these like wildfire, and students that could drive went out to lunch more often.
Because the student government primarily used food sales to stay financially alive, they ended up in a massive debt when the sales dropped. School and class activities were cut down to bare-bones celebrations.
Twice a year, our school also held a food fair: all of the clubs would sell some sort of food. Of course, the clubs were held to the same state regulations. This greatly limited the types of foods that could be sold, meaning many foreign foods had to be substituted for healthy alternatives. So much for cultural awareness.
The biggest problem with the nutritional guidelines is that the only foods that can be sold rarely taste good. As a kid, taste is most important. If I’m eating a chicken sandwich, I want it to taste like chicken, not some healthy junk that tastes more like rubber. I didn’t receive discounted lunch, so my choice was simple:
Do I spend $2.25 and buy an awful school lunch, or do I go to Taco Bell and get a couple of burritos for the same price? It was really a no-brainer.
In the end, the stricter nutrition guidelines hurt much more than they helped. A lot of this was caused by our school having an open campus at lunch. What would have happened if we had a closed campus?
On a closed campus, the outside influence disappears, leaving kids with three choices: School food, food from home, or starve. Many kids choose to pass on wasting money on a school lunch that doesn’t taste good. Instead, they’ll either bring food from home or just wait until after school to eat.
This is pretty evident with a soda ban that’s come into use. According to a recent study, banning soda at schools only caused a 4% decrease in soda consumption.
Elementary & Middle Schools
Currently, the state uses stricter guidelines for elementary and middle school food standards than for high schools. This is logical.
I believe that there should still be nutritional requirements in elementary schools, but they should loosen up by middle school and be all but non-existent in high school. In elementary and middle school, students should take a Nutrition class to outline basic nutrition, and parents should do their best to help encourage healthy eating habits at home.
By the time high school rolls around, it’s a bit late.
Want more? Subscribe today!





1. Rob from Players Only Bonus
July 2nd, 2009 1:24 pm
Ugh, what happened to the enforcement of this bill? Whenever my daughter gets money of her own, I hear stories when she gets home of all the junk food she bought at school, and she’s only in the 7th grade!
.-= Rob@Players Only Bonus´s last blog ..Pitbull Poker Daily $1,000 Point Race & July $25 Instant Cash =-.